« Picture a window | Main | Copy cat, copy cat! »

April 19, 2010

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83420bd6e53ef01347ffaac52970c

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Peter Turnley's head, hands and feet:

Comments

Lucas

Very interesting, thank you! :)

Will Frostmill

Johnathan,
This is really insightful analysis. Thanks for posting this - I learned some new tricks :)

Carsten Bockermann

Jonathan,
I have to admit that I did the just what you did when I first saw the Semana Santa photos about a week ago - I looked at the EXIF and discovered the limit range of focal lengths used.
To me that sounds just like the way to do it. I remember that back when I used Leica M6 cameras I took the best photos when I carried the least amount of gear. In the end I carried only 28, 35 and 50mm lenses and discovered that I could have left the 50 at home.
After I short love affair with zooms (among them the 24-70) today I'm back to using fixed focal lengths on my D3S. Again, the 28 gets the most use with the 35 in second place. For pictures like this long lenses simply don't work; they would put the viewer into the position of a distant observer who's spying on the subjects with a telescope.
Carsten

jedrek

This might as well be named, "in defense of a 28mm prime"

Roger Dunham

The other technique you will see in almost every frame is the use of background content to add depth . Peter s images have a 3rd dimension to his composition..he layers in the background to complement his subject.

This is the aspect of his composition that makes you feel inside the procession. Beyond of course catching the exact moment.

He will shoot 6-10 frames to get just the right elements in the frame. His style is blend of artist and athlete .

I was attending his workshop in Seville and was shooting beside him for many of the images .

Miłosz Bolechowski

That's right - it's very useful analysis. And I also would like to have a 24-35/2.8 lens.

Richard

Of course if you are a mean sonofabitch you can modify your EXIF data rather than strip it out ......... that could get folks scratching their heads.

Seriously though, one of the useful things about DAM and general cataloguing software is it's ability to produce a statistical analysis of your own shooting parameters. Might be handy when deciding what new lens you really need

Account Deleted

Great observations.

After looking at the exif info, I also noted that, in the ones I examined, he use minus exposure bias. In some cases -1/3 and in one -2/3. Also the histograms were interesting.

I have just decided to return to my range finders and fixed lens after wandering for about 3 years in the digital slr wilderness.
Just not for me...

My next decision is to add a wide angle. Your observations were very useful to me.


Jonathan Castner

Hey gang! Yeah I'm pretty much a nerd with stuff like EXIF reading. For me it's like reading the ingredients on your cereal while you are eating it. Mmm, riboflavin!

Carsten, I agree that in situations like the one that Peter was working in keeping things simple often increases your ability to see well. My Nikon AF-D 28mm f/1.4 is my go to lens for this kind of stuff.

As for Mr. Dorn’s thoughts, if you are more comfortable with a rangefinder then use that. I use two range finder cameras and they don’t seem to change my ability to see pictures much at all. However since I tend to use moderately wide angle lenses at wide apertures I find the SLR easier to work with because I can easily see how much detail I’m getting or losing in my background. With a close focused 24mm lens wide open putting the soft blobs into the composition is to me easier because I can see them where with a rangefinder I need to guess. But then that’s me.

Cheers!

jordan 7

When talk about field,the first sight I think that is the own of somebody,but now I haven’t thought that,because I read your post,that new opinion there,thanks,learn the knowledge from you lots.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been saved. Comments are moderated and will not appear until approved by the author. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the author has approved them.